Friday, September 14, 2012

2.3 Lakh bighas: Bodo leaders give stats on encroachment


The Bodoland People’s Front, the party in control of the Bodoland Territorial Council, says over 39,000 non-tribal people, mainly illegal immigrants, have settled on 2.32 lakh bighas of government khas land in the Bodoland Territorial Autonomous Districts area. The party has cited these statistics in a list that The Indian Express has accessed from a senior leader.

“Most of the encroachers are illegal immigrants. We demand immediate recovery of khas land under the possession of the encroachers,” said BPF leader Darao Narzary. “If no action is taken the Bodoland Citizens’ Forum will move the Gauhati High Court. The illegal possession of tribal land by non-tribals is the reason behind the recent ethnic violence in the four BTAD districts. We have collected the details from the headquarters of the four districts, which shows that the government had full knowledge of land being grabbed but took no action,” he said.

BTC chief executive Hagrama Mohilary too expressed concern over encroachment by “people who are mostly Bangladeshi immigrants”. On Tuesday too, when Congress leader Rahul Gandhi toured relief camps, Mohilary said once again that only those with valid documents would be rehabilitated.

The issue of alleged encroachment has been the stumbling block at recent peace meetings with the Bodo leadership insisting that only recovery of the land can ensure lasting peace. “If the land is not cleared immediately, peace will not last in Bodoland,” Narzary s

Notice issued to Nikhil Wagle,Editor IBN Lokmat


To,                                                
The Editor
IBN Lokmat,

Subject:-About the Program ‘Ajacha Sawaal’ telecasted on IBN-Lokmat on dated 17th August 2012 at 21:00 O’ Clock and hosted by you about Violence in Aasam and fleeing of students of North East India from Bengaluru, Pune and Hyderabad.
Sir,
1.   Ajacha Sawaal is a program telecasted on your News channel everyday at 21:00 which is hosted by you.
2.   In this program dated 17th August 2012 while speaking with Mr. Sunil Deodhar, you made a statement that; you have a solid evidence to show that rumors are spread from both sides, while stating that you directly pointed at RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh). The statement unnecessarily damages image of RSS and RSS workers. It also creates false impression about RSS workers in the society. I am RSS worker and strongly believe RSS is not involved in any such anti social and anti national activities. Being an RSS worker I feel very insulting and hurt due to this statement. I feel that, my image in the society is damaged.
3.   As a reputed News channel and publisher of the above said program, Channel is also responsible for the same.   
4.   With this notice we are demanding evidences supporting your statement.
5.   In case you fail to tender the above said evidences within 15 days of the issuance of this notice, we will be constrained to proceed against you in appropriate court of law. And you only will be responsible for the same.

  Yours Truly

Nikhil Walimbe
                                                                                  

Synopsis-Decoding Rahul Gandhi by Aarthi Ramachandran


In a bid to demystify Brand Rahul, Decoding Rahul Gandhi chronicles his political path, which is different from that pursued by his mother Sonia, father Rajiv, and grandmother Indira. Although the 42-year-old Rahul has borrowed a few elements from them, he has carefully and deliberately added new ideas, strategies and practices from the world of business and management. Rahuls philosophy is a form of corpo-politics, where management principles are applied to political leadership, and socio-politics, where beliefs in inclusive growth are ingrained in overall strategies.
Why have Rahuls plans flopped so far? His initiatives to inculcate internal democracy in the Congress youth and student wings were well-intentioned, but lacked a clear-cut thrust and have failed to grapple with realpolitik. Decoding Rahul Gandhi is based on dozens of interviews with political actors, members of Rahuls team in the Indian Youth Congress (IYC) and National Students Union of India (NSUI), and his friends and acquaintances. Coupled with in-depth reportage of his electoral and political campaigns, the book establishes how Rahuls politics is riddled with inconsistencies, symbolism and an opportunistic, rather than committed, engagement with national issues.

The book throws light on the factors that have shaped him as a person and politician. It details his working style, which is nearer to a CEO of a Fortune 500 company, and the role played by the members of his A-Team (which includes Kanishka Singh and Sachin Rao).

How did Rahul Gandhis years abroad as a student and as a management consultant influence his politics? What was his much-hyped revamp of the IYC and the NSUI all about? What are the reasons for the Congress and Rahuls humiliating defeat in the 2012 Uttar Pradesh assembly elections? How has he applied global management principles, like The Toyota Way and Bottom of the Pyramid, to domestic politics? Prime Minister Rahul Gandhi what would this mean for India?

About the Author
Aarthi Ramachandran is a political journalist who has worked with leading Indian newspapers such as The Economic Times and Business Standard. She has written about the Congress for the past seven years and tracked Rahul Gandhis political career closely. She is now a freelancer, attempting the transition from being a full- time journalist to a full-time mother. She lives in Delhi with her husband and daughter.


Kudankulam protests: Hijacked by the church and the foreign hand?


Generally our Prime Minister rarely opens his mouth and, even then, he speaks little. When it came to Kudankulam our Prime Minister went back to the 1980s vintage, ‘Foreign Hand’ theory when he railed against the protest. This time however, for a change, he made sense.

The story actually begins in 1974. The year in which Indira Gandhi decided that India needed some nuke bombs. Let us say the US was as benevolent towards India after that nuclear test as the US today is towards Iran.

In line with the US policy of benevolence, India was slapped with a trade embargo, which among other things, prevented us from getting something called uranium. And without the uranium, the entire nuclear infrastructure in the country at that time went into panic mode. The reactors were scaled down and power generation was cut because we did not have sufficient fuel.

Since India refused to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, no uranium-rich, decadent western country was willing to sell it to us. According to them, if India ever got uranium, she would peddle it to the first crackpot dictator who wanted to build a bomb.

India was effectively placed in a quarantine, and denied access to anything that was remotely related to ‘Nuclear’.

The status quo continued till 2006, when George W Bush arrived in India. Amidst all the despicable things George W Bush has inflicted on this world, he has to get credit for one thing. He was the only guy who got Manmohan Singh to talk. In fact ‘Dubya’ Bush is singularly responsible for Manmohan speaking up for something that did not have the word Gandhi in it.

If you are wondering if I’m making that up, here is a clue: do the words INDO-US NUCLEAR DEAL mean anything to you?

Well, for Manmohan Singh, it meant a lot. Hell, it meant so much that, MMS flipped the normal protocol of ‘Madam Tell, Me Follow’ upside down. He allowed India a brief glimpse of a part of his anatomy called the spine. For the first and the last time as a PM, in 2008, he opposed a major coalition partner, stood his ground and got something done.

MMS single-handedly ended India’s three=decade-long nuclear isolation.

But there are no free lunches in the capitalist world.

When the US guys told us they will take care of that NPT thingy and get us all the uranium we need, as a quid pro quo, they demanded a major slice of the Indian nuclear power pizza. In fact they wanted the whole pizza. You see, the whole point of this generous nuclear deal was to ensure the US derives the maximum economic benefit out of our inevitable nuclear boom.

The major hurdle in the quest for that pizza: Kudankulam Nuclear Plant.

You see, the reactors used to generate electricity in Kudankulam, the aforementioned VVER-1000 reactors, are a direct competitor to General Electric’s Advanced Boiling Water Reactor. If the VVER-1000 is successful, India might opt for more of these reactors to satiate her power demands, which are projected to go north.

If that happens, the US would become the guy who did everything possible to impress a girl, only to see a direct competitor walking away with the credit and the girl on a first date.

Just think about it:  the other nuclear project announced after the deal was signed was Jaitapur. It was a French one.

In short, the US has every reason to pray for the failure of Kudankulam. Mostly because if Kudankulam is successful, the US will be the biggest loser.

After the PM’s accusation (about foreign NGOs creating a hurdle) in the Science Magazine interview, the Home Ministry moved quickly to freeze the accounts of four NGOs – Tuticorin Diocese Association (TDA), Tuticorin Multipurpose Social Service Society (TMSSS), People’s Education for Action and Liberation and Good Vision Trust.

According to the Ministry of Home Affairs, they were misdirecting the funds meant for social work to fund a political protest. This is explicitly stated as wrong. See Image I.

The Ministry of Home Affairs, has an amazing web-page. It lists all the transactions made by NGOs that receive more than Rs 1 crore a year.

Here is the 2010-2011 account statement of the Tuticorin Multipurpose Social Service Society (TMSSS). Click on link to see Image 2 for details.

Notice that the maximum money has been spent in activities mysteriously classified as ‘Others’. No explanation has been given on what activities ‘Others’ constitute. Now, this particular NGO has received more than Rs 42 crore in foreign donations, over the last five years.

But the NGO doesn’t even have a website of its own. A website where they can publish detailed accounts of what they are doing with all the money. Introduce some modicum of transparency. Now, why is that?

Similarly, the other NGO, the Tuticorin Diocese Association, received Rs 22 crore in the same period. It too does not have a website or a statement.

So this mysterious money trail leads to a dead end. But that is not the only problem. On 6 February, the Home ministry stated that these very NGOs received Rs 54 crore from sources abroad.

Now, with a very minimum knowledge of economics, I think Rs 54 crore is quite a lot of money. According to the Home Ministry, the NGOs do not have the accounts to show for it. And no person from these two NGOs has come out and given a convincing reply to the Home Ministry’s accusation.

In fact, the two NGOs in question are headed by the same guy, one Bishop Yvon Ambroise. Since the day the report was published in The Hindu, this person has gone underground. I mean, if you are so honest about your financials, why this mysterious silence?
Similiarly, the home ministry also alleges that Dr Udayakumar received Rs 1.5 crore in his account to fund this agitation. In typical Udayakumar style, he countered it aggressively, even claiming dramatically that he was ready to be hanged if it was established that he had received money. And his NGO, the People’s Movement Against Nuclear Energy (PMANE), released its own account statement to prove its innocence. This is what it said:

Total fund collection: Rs 25, 17,991. Collected Rs 200 from every household in Idinthakarai with additional help coming from fishermen, beedi workers etc, who contributed 10 percent of their earnings.

Total expenditure: Rs 17,64,233. Spent on hiring transport, diesel genset, marquees, and supply of water to the people who congregate at the protest fast venue.

As usual, no specifics have been given. Also, PMANE does not have a website where it can publish a detailed report. Our media, as is the norm, didn’t bother to verify this statement.

Turns out that the village of Idinthakarai has a total population of 3,996. Assuming 3 members per household, the total number of households in that village is only about 1,332.

Going by Udayakumar’s assertion and assuming every household contributed, the total amount collected comes to: Rs 2,66,400.

Where did you get the rest of the money –  Rs 22,51,591 – from, Dr Udayakumar? Are you telling us that the fishermen and beedi workers from Kudankulam contributed this amount??

Or is the Prime Minister right when he says foreign money is at play?

Paying protesters to campaign against a venture by your competitor is an old tactic in India. Every industrialist worth his or her salt has done it at some point of time in his/her life.

But in this case, I am unduly worried because this protest has taken a direction that does not augur well for the security of our country.

The whole protest is religiously motivated.

Remember  Bishop Ambroise in the previous paragraph?  Well, he is on record, with his opposition to the Kudankulam Nuclear Power plant. Now this person is not some layman voicing his views on this subject. He is a bishop, a very senior person in the hierarchy of the church.

Why is a representative of the church, that too a Bishop, taking an active part in the protest?

There’s not even the usual excuse that he is acting out of his own free will. The Roman Catholic Church is an organisation that is proud of its chain of command. No church member, I believe, can act independently without the sanction of someone from above. And when the guy leading this protest is a senior functionary in the church, it can mean only one thing: The anti-Kudankulam protest has  blessings from the highest levels of the Church hierarchy.

Now, why is the church taking a pro-active interest in a nuclear power plant, somewhere down in South India?

The involvement of the church cannot be dismissed lightly. In rural Tamil Nadu, for most of the villagers, the voice of reason happens to be the local parish priest. And all the parish priests in and around Kudankulam are heavily against the establishment of the power plant. They make no bones about their stand on this issue, and they don’t even have a choice. The person right on top of the church pyramid has made his stand very clear.

When a priest, in his Sunday mass and service, exhorts the villagers to join the protest, what are they  going to do?

Most of the people in and around Kudankulam are joining the protests, not because they believe in the cause. They are turning up because their priest asked them to. And they are admitting it openly.

This means that what was supposed to be a peaceful public protest has, as the Indian Express put it brilliantly, been hijacked by the local diocese and the church. And that is not a good sign.

Not for a country that calls itself secular.

The only thing that has irked me more than this shameless religious takeover of the movement is our mainstream media’s turning a Nelson’s eye  towards it. Why aren’t there more damning articles, like this one, on the role of the church in the Kudankulam agitation?

Why this thing is not the ‘Burning Question’ on Times Now? Why is it not on Face The Nation?

And finally, where is Digvijay Singh?

I mean, when people from the RSS, a Hindu group with no connection to the inner sanctum of Hindu religion, participated in a secular, public movement against corruption,  this dude wasted no time in painting the entire movement with a saffron brush. According to him, ‘communal forces’ were attempting to use the ‘platform’ of a ‘public movement’ to ‘threaten the social fabric of the country’. Or some nonsense like that.

But here, people who are high up in the Church hierarchy, representing the church, are actively aiding and abetting this unreasonable protest.

So, why is this guy quiet? Why the hell is everybody quiet?

Unfortunately, I do not have answers to these questions.
Courtsey:-FP

Rosh Hashanah 2012 - This Is Not A New Threat




During the month of Elul, when Jews around the world prepare for the High Holidays, we were treated to a special New Year’s greeting from Iran’s leaders. Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called Israel, “a true cancer tumor on this region that should be cut off.” President Ahmadinejad told the world, “Anyone who loves freedom and justice must strive for the annihilation of the Zionist regime.”

You don’t have to lecture Israel about the horrors of war. Israelis have been forced to send their sons and daughters to fight in 6 wars for only one reason; her neighbors’ unwillingness to see a Jewish flag fly over a miniscule piece of her ancestral homeland.

This is not a new threat. The Iranian regime has consistently been calling for Israel’s destruction. But now, they are on the threshold of acquiring nuclear weapons, which is a threat to every country, and yet the world still wants to wait – just as they were willing to wait on Hitler. Had the world listened to Churchill’s warnings in the 1930’s, we could have avoided the catastrophe of the 1940’s – World War II and the Holocaust.

Israel cannot wait like America or England. She is not separated by an ocean or sea. She has nowhere to hide. The Ayatollah will not change his mind. It is we who must change ours. The leaders of the Western world should return the greeting and tell Iran, in plain language, “give up your nuclear weapons program or we will join Israel in wiping out your nuclear capacity.” And don’t expect anything from the United Nations. It's saving a prominent place at the podium of the General Assembly this month for none other than Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Rabbi Marvin Hier
SWC Dean & Founder


Jamiat condemns blasphemous film, killing of US ambassador


13 September 2012

New Delhi: Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind General Secretary Maulana Mahmood Madani has condemned the blasphemous documentary movie terming it offensive to the Prophet of Islam and also condemned the killing of US ambassador in Libya by the protestors. Maulana Madani appealed to Muslims to remain and clam and refrain from retaliatory actions.

He asked the government of India to immediately block the concerned portion of youtube taking care of the sentiments of billions of Indian Muslims. He also demanded that the US should act harshly against the producer if it really feels the pain of the Muslims of the world over.

Maulana Mahmood Madani termed the movie as a conspiracy to malign Islam and distort its true face.

Condemning the killing of US ambassador in Benghazi, Maulana Madani appealed to the Muslims to remain calm and peace and avoid retaliatory actions. He warned the community against “antisocial elements of their ranks whose sentimental actions only give bad name to Muslims and Islam.”

The 14-min trailer of the film “Innocence of Muslims” was uploaded on Youtube in July but recently its Arabic version was reloaded causing violent protests in the Arab World on Tuesday.

Local Vs Muslims violence may continue, centre warns Assam


New Delhi : The central government has warned the Assam government that the situation arising out of the ethnic strife between Bodos and Muslims "is far from normal" and that further trouble was brewing in districts neighbouring the Bodo areas.
Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde conveyed this assessment to the Cabinet Committee on Political Affairs (CCPA) chaired by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh at his Race Course Residence here Thursday, according to informed sources.
The meeting was convened to mainly discuss the Assam violence witnessed since July 19 that has claimed 97 lives and left 4.8 lakh people in relief camps.
Shinde gave an overall assessment of the Assam violence and the situation prevailing in the Bodo Territorial Autonomous District (BTAD) areas of Kokrajhar, Chirang, Baksa and Udalgiri.
The home minister's assessment, according to the sources, was that Bodos' fear of becoming a minority in their own land was the reason for the troubles in the state.
At present, there are 35 percent Bodos, 14 percent tribals, 15 percent Muslims, 10 percent Bengalis, 15 percent Assamese and others forming the remaining 11 percent population in the Bodo areas.
The Bodos were worried they would get marginalised as migrants from other states within the country and from outside the country settled in their territory and this was the historical background for the violence being witnessed in Assam, Shinde reportedly told the meeting.
The central government also felt that though the developments of the recent days, when people of northeast origin returned to cities like Bangalore, Pune, Chennai and other places from where they had fled last month, was encouraging, "the situation is still far from being normal".
The miscreants, the government felt, were waiting to cause trouble and that the state governments needed to maintain vigil.
They also held that indications were clear that similar sectarian tension was spreading to neighbouring districts of the BTAD such as Barpeta, Karimganj and others.
Communal passion was still running high in some of the districts of the state, according to the central government.
It has also suggested to Assam government that to prevent such violence from recurring, a comprehensive security plan that is fool proof needs to be put in place.
The CCPA was also informed that there were 213 of the 340 relief camps still functioning in the state and about 1.92 lakh people still staying in these camps out of the 4.8 lakh who had been displaced due to the violence.
It was also told that 141 camps had been closed after 2.93 lakh people returned to their homes.
(Courtsey:-TCN)

Add to Google