Thursday, March 7, 2013

Knanaya Catholics protest in US city


(UCANews)



The endogamous community's traditions are in jeopardy in the United States.

Hundreds of members Knanaya Catholic Church held a peaceful protest on Sunday in the US city of Elmhurst demanding to accept their unique traditions in the Church.

The Church's members living in US marched past the Elmhurst home of Syro-Malabar Bishop Mar Jacob Angadiath.

Rally coordinator Sciens (pronounced Sheens), said this endogamous community's traditions are in jeopardy in the United States.

The rally aimed to show solidarity among the Knanaya community members, who are committed to preserve their traditions dating back to third century when their forefathers migrated from the Middle East to India.

"Our identity is maintained by members being born into the Knanaya community," he said. "Marriages in the church have to be between Knanaya man and Knanaya woman. That is the way the communities have been for hundreds of years," he added.

He said when Kerala-based Syro-Malabar Church, to which the community belongs, established their ecclesiastic structures in the U.S., they had expected they would be allowed to maintain those traditions.

"Recently, through an order, we were told that our community's traditions—membership in our churches—is not consistent with Catholic Church traditions," he said.

"We are trying to show the church they are not correct," Sciens said.

The community now wants a personal parish "for our community" to help protect its identity. "That is our appeal and our plea," he added.

Members at the rally were from New York, Los Angeles and everywhere in between.

"We would like to find a permanent, sustainable solution, because it affects not only Knanaya Catholics in the United States, but also all over the world," Sciens said.

Microsoft apologizes for violating EU antitrust order


(USAToday)



SEATTLE – The $731 million fine European regulators slapped on Microsoft Wednesday for failing to abide by an antitrust sanction reinforces the European Union's longstanding insistence on fair competition.

What's more, the huge penalty also signaled that Europe won't easily be swayed by Google and Facebook to back down from expanding online privacy rights for individuals, a policy that the U.S. tech and media companies contend would crimp the global growth of online advertising.

"This puts a spotlight on how important it is for global companies to take into account the laws and customs of the places they do business," says Charles King, principal analyst at tech industry research firm Pund-IT. "If they can't do that, they're almost begging for the sort of spankings the EU has administered to Microsoft."

Citing a technical error, Microsoft took full responsibility for failing to give European consumers a choice of Web browsers in shipping some 15 million copies of the Windows 7 operating system. The company had agreed to do that as part of a 2009 sanction closing out a protracted antitrust investigation conducted by the EU's competition commission.

That antitrust case began in 2004, and Microsoft paid fines of $357 million in 2006 and $1.3 billion in 2008 for being slow to comply with regulations.

The company's board last year reduced CEO Steve Ballmer's bonus in anticipation of some sort of embarrassing sanction. "Microsoft cut a deal with the EU and failed to live up to it," says Randal Picker, law professor at the University of Chicago. "That will get you in trouble in the EU or the U.S."

The company didn't say whether it would challenge this latest fine, but it is not expected to do so. "We have apologized for it," Microsoft said in a statement. "We have taken steps to strengthen our software development and other processes to help avoid this mistake — or anything similar — in the future."

The $731 million fine represents about 1% of Microsoft's annual revenue. That's large enough to send a signal that Europe will sink its teeth into promoting fair competition. It also sends the message that Europe is likely to stand firm on consensus support for the hot issue of the moment: reinforcing online privacy.

Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Amazon and eBay, among others, are intensely lobbying EU regulators to back down from a proposal intended to give hundreds of millions of Europeans a stronger legal basis to opt out of online tracking. U.S. tech and media companies argue that any substantive change in the way online ads are delivered to Internet users, based on intensive tracking of individual consumers' preferences and behaviors, would squelch innovation and hamper the global economy.

Google is the subject of an active EU investigation for potentially violating existing privacy rules last year when it consolidated 60 privacy policies into one. In doing so, the search giant combined data collected on individual users across its major services: search, YouTube, Gmail and the social network Google+.

"Today's tough fine imposed on Microsoft shows that European authorities are serious about enforcement," says John Simpson, analyst for the non-profit Consumer Watchdog advocacy group. "The EU antitrust enforcers aren't going to roll over like the U.S. Federal Trade Commission did with its investigation of Google. Similarly, I expect European data-protection authorities to take strong stands to enforce online privacy laws."

By contrast, Marc Rotenberg, president of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, says there is a lot of frustration among consumer groups in the US about the Federal Trade Commission's failure to enforce its own settlement agreements with Google and Facebook.

In both instances, the FTC reached comprehensive agreements with the companies and in both case the FTC failed to enforce its orders after the companies made substantial changes to their business practices, Rotenberg says.

"The clearest example is the March 1, 2012 consolidation of the Google privacy policy," says Rotenberg. "The FTC failed to act, but EU privacy regulators signaled recently that there will be sanctions."

Revival of Venezuela's Oil Sector on Stand-By


(WSJ)




Venezuela's battered oil industry bore the burden of Hugo Chávez's socialist dream. Now the charismatic leader's death gives his successors the opportunity to unlock its potential, but few in the oil industry expect an immediate renaissance.

Under Mr. Chávez's rule, a huge oil-sector strike, the firing of thousands of top engineers, poor maintenance, frequent refinery accidents and the diversion of oil revenue into social programs and subsidies to foreign allies crippled Petróleos de Venezuela SA, the national oil company.

Despite arguably having the world's largest oil reserves, Venezuela's oil output fell by nearly a third to about 2.5 million barrels—about ...

Add to Google