Creation of Bosnian Muslim State Led to Ethnic Cleansing of 440,000 Catholics

(Courtsey:-FP Magazine)

October 14, 2012 

In the late 90s the trendy thing to do was to agonize over the fate of Bosnian Muslims and all the terrible horrors that the PoorMuslims (TM) were experiencing in Sarajevo. Ethnic cleansing was the word of the day and the Serbs were the new villains of the hour.

Steven Spielberg even managed to make the ultimate liberal thriller, The Peacemaker, starring  George Clooney racing against the clock to stop a Serb terrorist from launching a nuclear attack on New York City. (This proved to be a very timely film to make in 1997. Four years before Muslim terrorists (Shhh they don’t exist) launched a real attack against New York)

NATO carved out a Bosnian Muslim state by bombing a bunch of Serbian Christians, civilians and non-civilians, Billy Clinton didn’t really care. And ethnic cleansing became an actual thing… just not ethnic cleansing of Muslims. Mohammed’s last command to his followers was to drive the Jews and Christians out of Arabia. And as Muslims have expanded their reach, they have religiously been keeping their unholy prophet’s command.

Christians are massively leaving post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina amid mounting discrimination and Islamization, according to a new report released Friday, October 12.

There are just 440,000 Catholics left in the Balkan nation, half the prewar figure, the group said.

Puljic reportedly complained that while dozens of mosques were build in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo, no building permissions were given for Christian churches.

“The cardinal already waits 13 years on permission to build just a small church,” Church in Need said.  Authorities so far refused to return hundreds of nationalized church buildings, despite a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights to do so, according to Christian officials.

But that is what you get when you create another “moderate” Muslim state. Muslims may demand the right to build mega-mosques in London, Tennessee and right next to Ground Zero, but they don’t reciprocate. Islam has no notion of human rights… only Muslim rights.  Or rather the rights of Muslim men over all sorts of inferior types like women and non-Muslims. Create a Muslim state and you get discrimination against non-Muslims. It’s how the religion works.

In published remarks, Van Rompuy made clear that giving Bosnia-Herzegovina a “European perspective”, the code word for eventual European Union membership, “is the only way to overcome the crisis”.

How has the European perspective worked out for the millions of Muslims in France, Germany and the UK?

Are Muslims getting a European Perspective or are Europeans getting a Muslim Perspective? 

US judge explains decision on anti-Islam ads in Metro

(wjla.com)

WASHINGTON (AP) - A federal judge who ordered D.C.'s public transit system to put up pro-Israel ads that equate Muslim radicals with savages said Metro officials voiced reasonable safety concerns but failed to consider other alternatives when they delayed displaying the messages.

U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer issued a 17-page opinion Friday explaining an earlier decision that ordered Metro to display the ads, which were proposed by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, an advocacy organization harshly critical of Muslim radicals and run by blogger Pamela Geller.

The judge's initial ruling came without explanation last week in a one-page order.The group contracted to display four 43-by-62 inch dioramas on subway platforms with the message: "In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad."The same ads began running last month in some New York subway stations, and after Collyer's order, went up in a handful of Metro stations this week.Metro officials had delayed putting up the ads, with officials saying they were concerned the messages could provoke hostile reactions and violent disputes in light of the tumultuous response in the Middle East last month to the video, "Innocence of Muslims," which denigrated the prophet Muhammad.The organization sued, prompting Collyer's ruling.Collyer said she was sympathetic to Metro officials' safety concerns and agreed that the transit system "certainly presents a compelling government interest in the safety of its passengers and employees."But, she said, Metro officials erred in being "too open-ended" in postponing the placement of the ads, a delay "not tied to the waxing or waning of anti-American sentiment or danger and not based on any objective evaluation of necessity." That decision restricted the group's First Amendment rights more than was necessary.

She also said Metro had failed to consider displaying the messages in locations other than the subway station platforms and could have distanced itself from the ad's messages by placing its own disclaimers alongside the anti-jihad ads.

"While, indeed, the contract was for advertising in the illuminated dioramas on subway platforms, a content-neutral and less restrictive answer to concerns about disputes on the platforms would surely have been to put the ads elsewhere in one of (the transit system's) numerous other advertising venues," Collyer wrote.

Also on Friday, the Council on American-Islamic Relations announced its own advertising campaign on Metro in response to the anti-Muslim ads.

One of the ads quotes the Quran: "Show forgiveness, speak for justice and avoid the ignorant."