LRO Writes to CBCI President Cardinal Cleemis Catholicos, to request comment on Pynursla Gang Rape in Khasi Hills of Meghalaya by culprits close to Catholic Church

LRO Writes email to CBCI President Cardinal Cleemis Catholicos, to request comment on Pynursla Gang Rape in Khasi Hills of Meghalaya by culprits close to Catholic Church

 
From: Legal Rights Observatory 
Date: 25 September 2017 at 10:40
Subject: CBCI, Please Speak Something About Pynursla Gangrape in Meghalaya
To: Baselios Cleemis , Baselios Cleemis

To,

Cardinal Cleemis Catholics,

President,

The Catholic Bishops' Conference of India (C.B.C.I.)

Hello,

We have came across news reports that CBCI condemned murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh few weeks ago. We appreciate CBCI's concerns regarding free speech and we equally appreciate swiftness with which Catholic Bishop body expressed itself after Lankesh murder. But what baffled Legal Rights Observatory is the stoic silence by CBCI in gang-rape of a girl at Pynursla in Khasi Hills of Meghalaya by culprits very close to Catholic Church.

Also the professionalism which Catholic Church shown in stalling Police action and arrest of culprits is really matter of concern for Meghalaya's Civil Society Groups and Women Rights Bodies in North East India.

If responsible religious body like CBCI, with Pan-Indian presence behaves in such a biased manner while dealing with issues pertaining to atrocities on womanhood, then credibility of CBCI as dedicated religious body will receive irreparable jolt.

So, as a legal rights group, Legal Rights Observatory- LRO requests CBCI to come out openly, condemn gang rape on girl in Pynursla and order you local officer bearers not to indulge and pressurize law enforcement agencies in this heinous  act.

The swift action by CBCI in this matter can still salvage its image and can re-establish its credibility as upright, professional and moral religious authority.

Regards,

Convener

Legla Rights Observatory- LRO

Paid News Complaint Filed Against Goa Catholic Bishop's Magazine for Its Appeal During Manohar Parrikar By-election

Legal Rights Observatory filed paid news complaint against Goa and Daman Catholic Bishop's mouthpiece magazine under Representatives of People's Act 1951 for its article before last months assembly by-election on Panaji assembly seat where chief minister Manohar Parrikar was candidate.

In the controversial article the article authored by a lawyer had appealed people to vote against Manohar Parrikar and defeat him in election.

LRO shot a complaint to Goa State Election Commission to investigate what Catholic Magazine and its owners received quid pro quo by publishing the article and whether there any financial transactions between rival political parties and Catholic leaders.

Also LRO requested Election Commission to refer Balasaheb Thakarey VS Election Commission case in which Sena chief was stripped off of his voting rights for using religious appeal in elections. Here is the copy of LRO complaint.

Interrogate Scroll for Gauri Lankesh Murder, LRO Writes to NIA DG

Legal Rights Observatory writes letter to National Investigation Agency- NIA to investigate Scroll website's reporters in journalist Gauri Lankesh murder case. The Scroll website has published a report quoting "Friends and Associates" of Gauri Lankesh which have clues about killers of Lankesh. Gauri Lankesh was shot dead in Bengaluru yesterday by unidentified gunmen.






















Here is the copy of the LRO letter to DG- NIA
-----
To,

Shri. Sharad Kumar, IPS

DG NIA,

About:- Possible evidences of murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh in Bengaluru on September 05, 2017.

Dates:- September 06, 2017

Sir,

While surfing internet regarding yesterday's murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh in Bengaluru- Karnataka, Legal Rights Observatory team came across news report on site www.scroll.in 

The report's title is "Gauri Lankesh remembered: ‘She took majoritarian Hindutva politics head on"  and it is available on the link https://scroll.************************************************

The very first paragraph of the report mentions that,"Gauri Lankesh, senior journalist and activist, was staunchly secular and vocal about it. Lankesh was known to be critical, and stridently so – about Hindutva, Right-Wing forces in the country and also about Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This often got her into trouble and is what, many of her friends and associates suspect, got her killed."

Especially last line of aforesaid paragraph specifically points out at deceased Gauri Lankesh's friends and associates along with Scroll website's reporters who have hints about the people conspiring and actually killing Gauri Lankesh.

With this letter, LRO demands immediate interrogation of Scroll website's reporters to extract the names of "Friends and Associates" of Gauri Lankesh, who could share the names of perpetrators of her murder. LRO believes that immediate and professional investigation of Scroll's sources could quickly crack the case and it would help in reaching to the assassins. If we comes across any such evidences in this regard we would like to share it with NIA.

Thanks,

***********

Convener

Legal Rights Observatory

Kerala RSS Murders- Legal notice issued to Kerala Chief Secy, DGP and SP Thiruvanthapuram

Press Release

My Supreme Court lawyer Adv Umesh Sharma- New Delhi has today issued legal notice to Kerala Chief Secretory, Kerala DGP and Superintendent of Police Thiruvanthapuram in the matter of murder of RSS worker Rajesh, few days ago. We will move to Supreme Court if immediate action is not taken by Kerala government to put full stop on on violence against RSS workers by CPM workers in collusion with notorious Quotation Gangs and Islamic Jihadi radicals.

In near future, we will also move another petition to expedite legal proceedings in the matter pending against Kerala CM Pinnarayi Vijayan in murder cases. 

We are going to pursue each and every murder of RSS worker in legal way and will take every matter to conclusive end.

Regards,

Vinay Joshi

Notice to Catholic Bishop for Speaking Maoist Propaganda Language

To,

President,

CBCI,

Cardinal Cleemis Catholicos,

About:- Statement on Bishop Paul Toppo regarding recruitment of Tribal youth from Chhattisgarh in central forces

Sir,

We have came to know from UCANEWS portal news that Bishop Paul Toppo, Bishop of Raigarh from Chhattisgarh has opposed the government decision to raise exclusively Tribal battalions comprising local tribal of Bastar region of Chhattisgarh. Though Bastar region in particular and Chhattisgarh state in particular is reeling under intense bloodshed from leftist insurgents called Maoists, we never heard that Bishop Toppo or any other officer bearer of his institution ever uttered a single word condemning it. So, his statements are highly objectionable and condemnable by all means.

So, with this letter, we demand immediate action against Bishop Paul Toppo for blatantly denying the Tribal Youth, the Right to Earn Livelihood offered by Indian Constitution.

we want to drag your attention to following points,

1) His statement against recruitment of Tribal youth in CRPF is against spirit of Article 21 of The Constitution Of India, which offers liberty to all Indian citizens personal liberty.

2) By denying the tribal youth, the right to earn and live respectfully in the society by serving in Central Armed Forces he has committed a crime and also, his statement has insulted Scheduled Tribe people of the state. So Bishop Paul Toppo's statement is actually a crime under stringent SC And The ST(Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

3) The same report says that Bishop Toppo has earlier welcomed the decision to raise exclusively Tribal CRPF battalions, but now opposing it for unknown reasons, so there is high possibility that he has struck deal with underground Maoist insurgents and he is opposing the CRPF recruitment to fulfill conditions in that deal, so CBCI must investigate reasons behind Bishop Toppo's volte-face, otherwise we have to approach Police to unearth and expose unholy nexus between Bishop Toppo and Maoists insurgents. 

With this letter, we want to amply make clear that, if CBCI fails to take punitive action against Bishop Paul Toppo and other responsible CBCI office bearers for his anti-Tribal actions and actions which are directly or indirectly aiding and supporting Maoists cause; We will explore legal means to punish him under appropriate IPC sections in Court of Law.

If CBCI fails to respond us within 15 days from today, we would take our own course.

Regards,

Legal Rights Observatory- LRO

LRO Raised Strong Objection to WBO Representation at UNHRC, Appeals Modi Govt to Investigate Matter

To,
Shri Narendra Modi,
Prime Minister of India,
Sangharsh Apte, a research scholar from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai, has drawn the attention of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to the recent cuts in the expenditure on higher education in the country.He made a representation at UNHRC in Geneva on Friday June 16, 2017 in this regard. The representation urged UNHRC to take appropriate measures and make the Indian government accountable for the protection of Dalit and tribal students’ rights. Tata Institute of Social Sciences administration’s recent withdrawal of its financial aid to the students belonging to Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST) and Other Backward Classes (OBC), with a family income below the union government norms, also found mention in the representation to UNHRC.
The representation was part of World Barua Organization's 4 member delegation.
After the submission of representation, UNHRC mischievously made some remarks against Indian society. The remarks which are on their website reads,"“The World Barua Organisation reminded that, traditionally, the Dalit and lower-caste people had been barred from the education system in India. Despite later legal changes, which had allowed them to attend university, the recent reduction of education grants for those groups had led to a large number of students having to withdraw their university admissions.”
So, with this letter I demand,
1) Immediate investigation of the four members of the representation for theior funding sources,
2) Full scale inquiry of financial sources of World Barua Organization- WBO,
3) Intelligence inquiry of the WBO and all four members who visited UNHRC to find out the reason which compelled them to approach UNHRC instead of approaching Government of India to seek justice for SC and NT students,
4) Govt of India should seek clarification from UNHRC for their remarks made against Indian society which are full biased, mischievous and objectionable.
If Government of India neglects this issue, then it will set dangerous precedent for malicious fringe elements to raise India's internal social issues on world forums, only intended to tarnish India's image in the world.
Expecting immediate action in this regard.

Regards,
********
Office Secretory
Legal Rights Observatory- LRO

LRO Lodges Complaint Against NCERT Text Books as It Referred Honored Slain Maoist KishenjI in Class 10 Books

NCERT Class 10 textbooks contains references of slain Maoist leader Kishen ji and the whole chapter has been spent on honoring him and his so called pro poor thoughts. These references are in chapter 6 of the said book in curricular. The report is published in this regard at English Newspaper Hitvad from Nagpur on this link http://www.ehitavada.com/hitavadanew.aspx?lang=6NB=2017-05-03spage=NCpageSB=2017-05-03NCpage_1
The report is authored by journalist Kartik Lokhande.
With this letter, I demand immediate and stern action against NCERT contributors of the said chapter which have given generous place in school books to violent armed leader letting the blood of security forces and common people flow freely.
Also I am demanding setting up inquiry committee to hunt down and punish all violent Maoists entrenched in the educational system, spoiling educational environment and professing violent ideologies by inculcating violence in the minds of school kids through text books.

LRO Files Complaint Against Newspapers for Publishing Unverified Maoist Press Release against Troops

To,

The Secretory,

Press Council of India,

Few days ago armed Maoists attacked CRPF patrol party in Sukma in Chhattisgadh killing 25 troops. Later they mutilated bodies of martyred soldiers. There is extreme outrage in the people of India about the attack and lives lost in it. 

While reading the newspaper, we have came across the new report in various newspapers like, Hindustan Times, Economic Times, Outlook and DNA which has published Maoists Propaganda Press Release in the name of Vikalp, Spokesperson of CPI (Maoist) Dandakaranya Special Zonal Committee- CPIM-DSZC, as per all these news outlets, it is "Unverified Audio Clip", the excerpts of that audio clip reads that, "Sukma ambush was in response to gang-rapes, murders by security forces"

After reading the excerpts of propaganda audio clip, Legal Rights Observatory- LRO came to the conclusion that, 

1) Someone ( Read- Maoist and Naxalites) is playing foul game with Freedom of Press, which is amply available in India. And the news outlets knowing or unknowingly playing the role of Maoists Propaganda Machinery by broadcasting the message which is potentially harmful, solely targeted at harming morale of the security forces engaged in the Counter Insurgency Ops in Maoists infested area,

2) Every newspaper, which published the excerpts of CPIM-DSZC audio release mentioned that it is "Unverified" source, that means authenticity of the audio clip is questioned. In that case, when these newspapers were unaware of the authenticity of the audio release, for which good reason they published gist of that clip?

3) Was there any unseen motivation, allurement, ideological binding in publishing such "Unverified" audio press release?

4) Was that audio clip recorded in the news room instead of at CPIM-DSZC hideout to justify Maoist attack on troops and to question professionalism of the troops involved in the CI Ops?

As the questions and conclusions that propped up after reading transcripts of audio press release of CPIM-DSZC, Legal Rights Observatory- LRO, appeals Press Council of India to avoid repeat of such incidences, which are promoting Maoists cause under the guise of Freedom of Press and demands PCI, that,

1) PCI must seek clarification from all news outlets; print and digital about publishing excerpts of "Unverified Audio Clip",

2) PCi must formulate guidelines to avoid the incidences of our own media knowing or unknowingly playing role of Propaganda Machinery of Maoists harming National Security,

3) PCI shall issue advisory to all newspapers to take utmost precaution henceforth while publishing Press Releases issued by terror groups and underground outfits.

4) PCI must issue notices to all newspapers which has published excerpts of "Unverified Audio Clip" in the name of Freedom of Press.

5) Counter Terrorism force Assam Rifles which is dealing with insurgency in NE India had issued orders to 5 newspapers of Nagaland on October 25, 2015 prohibiting them from publishing Press Releases of insurgents in the state and playing as the part of PR machinery of the Ultras. So, if circumstances demands so, then there must be restrictions on Freedom of Press in broader national interests.

If, PCI fails to take corrective measures against these newspapers, then LRO will approach appropriate government department or Court of Law against these media outlets to stop malicious propaganda unleashed against troops involved in CI Ops.

Regards,

Vinay Joshi

Convener- LRO

Legal Rights Observatory

Huffington Post agreed to Publish LRO Opinion in Rajdeep Sardesai- Nandini Sundar Matter

To,

Huffington Post India,

Thanks for prompt reply.

 Legal Rights Observatory wants to clarify its position on HP report here.

First thing- As everyone knows, India's vast swathe of region is suffering from brutal Maoist and Naxalite violence. These armed rebels have unleashed terror in almost 11 Indian states. India's brave paramilitary forces and state Police are tackling them while beating all odds.

But biggest hurdle in their fight against Naxal and Maoists is not armed fighters living in hilly treks and jungles,but their Urban sympathizers, which are providing these bloodthirsty rebels with logistics, legal, propaganda, shelter, funds and by many other means.

Also Urban Naxal supporters are torturing Indian soldiers by slapping false and fabricated HR and Rape cases, to hit their morale.

The said activist called Nandini Sundar is openly Naxal supporter facing FIR and legal proceeding for murdering villager who was opposing Naxals on ground.

Also Nandini Sundar was involved in slapping false rape case against Indian soldier just few weeks ago, that case proved faux and Nandini forced to delete the tweet. I am attaching her tweets and few cuttings showing her fabrications.

Second Most important aspect which I want to clarify is, LRO never denied Freedom of Expression to anyone neither it would do so in future, But at the same time LRO will ruthlessly deal with those, giving well planed exposure to harbingers of violence and death, LRO won't allow anyone to run well oiled propaganda machinery on behalf of Naxals and LRO will fight all those tooth and nail, which are indulged in demoralizing our Armed Forces fighting relentless battle against merchants of death.

LRO is fully committed to all widows & orphaned kids of brave troops, who made supreme sacrifice for India.

With this letter LRO appeals and warns all sections of media to refrain from running vicious and violent propaganda against Indian Security Forces under the shoddy cover of journalistic immunity, freedom of speech and balanced journalism.

In future also LRO will monitor Indian media round the clock and will take effective legal corrective measures if Naxals, Maoists & Terror sympathizers are provided with undue and immoral importance and coverage.

I once again thanking HP for reciprocating LRO email and hope the our opinion also gets place on HP online/offline platforms.

Regards,

Vinay Joshi

Convener- LRO

Legal Rights Observatory

On 26 April 2017 at 15:36, Sruthijith KK <kk.sruthijith@huffingtonpost.in> wrote:

Sure, please send your views/comments and we'll be happy to include it in the report. 

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Legal Rights Observatory <lrobs.ind@gmail.com> wrote:

To,

Editor,

Huffington Post- India,

Today, your online edition published report on link http://huff.to/2ovaXPp with the title, "Rajdeep Sardesai Threatened With Police Complaint For Inviting Activist Nandini Sundar To His Show"

I am Legal Rights Observatory- LRO Convener, wants to clarify LRO position on the said report.

I hope, keeping in a view, values of free and fair values of moral and moral  ethical journalism, Huffington Post will definitely find a place in it's online/ offline edition to publish LRO views on the said issue.

So, please tell me whether I shall send clarification on the issue or not.

If HP have no space and time to voice our position, then we will explore all other available ways to do it.

Expecting your response.

Regards,

Vinay Joshi

Convener- LRO

Legal Rights Observatory

--

Sruthijith KK

Editor-in-chief

HuffPost.in

Express Building

9-10, Bahadurshah Zafar Marg

New Delhi

Desk: +91 11 4352 7959

Twitter.com/sruthijith

Complaint Filed against Rajdeep Sardesai for Inviting Urban Naxal Nandini Sundar in TV Debate

Dear Mr Puneet Jain,
Group Chief Corporate Affairs Officer
Group Chief Law & Compliance Officer
TV Today Network Ltd.
India Today Mediaplex,

Yesterday, after gruesome attack on CRPF troops at Sukma in Chhattisgadh which killed about 25 troops, your channel invited one so called Naxal Expert Nandini Sundar to debate on the attack. (Video Link of the debate:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fsUUQxB4kc&t=647s ) I am attaching here few tweets of Nandini Sundar, which clearly proves that She is not Naxal Expert but over ground Naxal worker, which pursues relentless agenda of defaming our troops and glorifying blood thirsty Naxals and Maoist.
By inviting such a notorious figure in live TV debate on your channel, your channel have openly pursued Pro-Naxal ideology and that is on the very day of epic bloodbath of our troops.
With this email, I am demanding stringent action against your Editor Rajdeep Sardesai and other members of the Editorial board for this shameless act.
I hope, you will carefully go through all 5 attachments to this email and then draw your own conclusion about the personality of the Nandini Sundar and her open role in promoting Naxal violence by cornering Indian Security Forces.
Promoting such heinous and violent ideology is punishable crime and in case, your channel fails to take action against guilty people, I will file Police complaint against your channel under stringent UAPA Act.



Regards,
Vinay Joshi
Convener
LRO
Legal Rights Observatory

LRO Seeks Clarification from PETA India About UP Illegal Slaughter Houses Ban

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Legal Rights Observatory 
Date: 2 April 2017 at 07:27
Subject: About Uttar Pradesh Illegal Slaughter Houses Ban
To: info@petaindia.org, media@petaindia.org, info@peta.org

Vinay Joshi LRO convener- Legal Rights Observatory, Amit Shah, Narendra Modi, vinay joshi rajdeep sardesai, sagarika ghose, sagarika ghosh

To,

PETA India,

Hi,

As you know, newly formed Uttar Pradesh state Government has ordered crack down on illegal slaughter houses in the state. After the execution of state government's order in this direction, the whole swath of Indian media jumped in to thrash, criticize and demonize state government of Uttar Pradesh.

But, what stunned LRO is  stoic silence assumed by PETA India on the issue. The people of India eagerly waiting for the statement from PETA India either supporting Uttar Pradesh Government or condemning those opposing ban on illegal slaughter houses, but nothing of that sort came in.

As PETA is always on front while demanding ban on Indian Bull Fight Jallikattu and many other issues pertaining to animal rights and ethical behavior with animals and birds, Indians were of the opinion that YOU will aggressively support ban promulgated by UP government.

So, with this email, LRO demands,

1) Immediate statement from PETA India either supporting or condemning ban on illegal slaughter houses by Uttar Pradesh government,

2) Immediate  statement from PETA India, either condemning or supporting those opposing ban promulgated by Uttar Pradesh government.

3) Statement from PETA India on Halaal Meat traditions dominant in few religions in the world, in which animals are slaughtered by cut to the jugular vein, carotid artery and windpipe, which prohibits killing animal and bird in single stroke.

The unambiguous statement from PETA India is must to prove that PETA stands for and committed to stop cruelty in all forms, against all animals and birds, irrespective of traditions, religions and regions.

If PETA India fails to clarify its position on aforesaid points, then it would be presumed as PETA is politically motivated, religiously biased and ideologically selectively ethical. In such scenario, it's credibility will receive serious setback and irreversible damage.

Regards,

**************

Convener- LRO 

LRO- Washington Post & New York Times Must Apologize or Face Breach of Privilege Motion for Yogi Adityanath Article

LRO raised the matter of derogatory and insulting articles published in The Washington Post & The New York Times on Yogi Adityanath, to Club representing foreign journalists in New Delhi. The Club, called The Foreign Correspondents Club of South Asia have representatives from all foreign media houses.
In an email LRO has demanded unconditional apology from both news papers about articles on Yogi Adityanath and further warned that it would request new assembly Speaker of Uttar Pradesh to move Breach Of Privilege Motion against both newspapers and its authors.
Here is original email by LRO

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Legal Rights Observatory 
Date: 27 March 2017 at 19:12
Subject: About Objectionable Content in Washington Post & New York Times
To: Mr Sanjeev Kumar Verma-THE FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS' CLUB OF SOUTH ASIA

To,

Mr Sanjeev Kumar Verma,

Manager- THE FOREIGN CORRESPONDENTS' CLUB OF SOUTH ASIA,

Sir,

After BJP leader Yogi Adityanath elected as CM of Uttar Pradesh, two US based newspapers viz, Washington Post & New York Times published highly objectionable and derogatory articles about Yogi Adityanath, the links of these articles pasted below.

As you know, such derogatory, foul and un-parliamentary language against any elected representative and decision of democratically elected members of the legislature comes under Breach of Privilege Rules 272.

So, with this email, Legal Rights Observatory- LRO demands unconditional and immediate apology from both newspapers mentioned above, otherwise LRO will move request to Speaker of Uttar Pradesh Assembly ( After new Speaker gets elected) to admit Breach Of Privilege Motion against both newspapers.

Parallelly LRO will explore all possible legal options to contain and punish malicious propaganda and smear campaign by Washington Post and New York times against Indian leaders.

Regards,

Vinay Joshi-Convener- LRO

Legal Rights Observatory

Complaint Lodged Against Sagarika Ghose at Lucknow Police For Malicious Tweet Against Yogi Adityanath

मा.मुख्यमंत्रीजी के संदर्भ मी बदनामी के खिलाफ शिकायत पत्र.

प्रति:- मा. पुलिस अधीक्षक, लखनौ- उत्तर प्रदेश,

विषय:- मा. योगी आदित्यनाथ जी- मुख्यमंत्री, उत्तर प्रदेश के बारे में सहेतु गलत और आपत्तिजनक जानकारी फ़ैलाने हेतु पत्रकार सागरिका घोष पर FIR दाखिल करने के संदर्भ में

महोदय,
 राज्य के नवनिर्वाचित मुख्यमंत्री मा. योगी आदित्यनाथ जी समाज में एक बेहद सम्मानित और उच्चपदस्थ व्यक्तित्व है. पिछले कई सालोंसे वे राजनीति में सक्रीय है. लेकिन पत्रकार श्रीमती. सागरिका घोष, जो टाइम्स ऑफ़ इण्डिया में वरिष्ठ संपादक के पद पर कार्यरत है, तथा विभिन्न टीवी चैनलोमें भी सदा सक्रीय रहती है, उन्होंने योही आदित्यनाथ जी की बदनामी करने तथा उनकी छवि धूमिल करने हेतु Twitter पर कुछ आपत्तिजनक चीजे डाली. बाद में इन्होने स्वयं इन चीजोंको हटा कर सफाई दे डाली, किन्तु तब तक योगी जी की छवि को जो नुकसान होना था वो हो चूका था.
सबसे पहले इन्होने जो चीज डाली वो तो अभी उपलब्ध नहीं है, लेकिन इस लिंक पर उसली छवि उपलब्ध है. https://twitter.com/rajalakshmij/status/843192449216401409 जिसमे उन्होंने दावा किया है की योगी आदित्यनाथ जी ने मृत मुस्लिम महिलाओंपर भी बलात्कार करने की हिमायत की.
बाद में जब लोगोने इसकी निंदा शुरू की तब जाकर उन्होंने अपनीही बात से पलट कर इस लिंक पर कहा https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/843146510963372033 की एक व्यक्ति ने योगी जी जिस मंच पर विराजमान थे उसी मंच से ये बात कही.
इससे पहले भी सागरिका घोष जी ऐसे निंदनीय कृत्य करते हुए पकड़ी गयी है.
इसलिए, इसी आवेदन के साथ मै आपसे करबद्ध निवेदन करता हु, की सम्बंधित पत्रकार सागरिका घोष जी के खिलाफ IT Act-2000, तथा अफवाह फैलाना और सांप्रदायिक तनाव फ़ैलाने के संदर्भ में उचित IPC की अलग अलग समुचित धाराओंके अंतर्गत प्राथमिकी दर्ज कर के (FIR) कठोर से कठोर करवाई की जाए, ताकि ऐसी गलती फिर से दोहराने की हिम्मत ना हो.

भवदीय,
*****
Legal Rights Observatory

Fresh Notice Issued to Rajedeep Sardesai for False allegation Against Yogi Adityanath on India Today TV Show

​

​

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vinay Joshi 
Date: 22 March 2017 at 10:54
Subject: Complaint Against India Today TV Channel
To: Puneet Jain-AAJ Tak
Cc: News Broadcasters Association , News Broadcasters Association

Intimation of Legal Action against India Today TV Channel 

Dear Mr Puneet Jain,

Group Chief Corporate Affairs Officer

Group Chief Law & Compliance Officer

TV Today Network Ltd.

India Today Mediaplex

Sir,

In a TV debate program on India Today TV channel after declaration of the name of Yogi Adityanath, as BJP's new Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Rajedeep Sardesai referred that Yogi Adityanath had professed the idea of raping dead Muslim women by pulling them out of the grave.  The allegation against Yogi stands baseless unless your channel tenders evidence supporting it. Mr Rajdeep's wife had made same allegation on Twitter against Yogi, which she withdrawn by deleting the tweet and putting fresh tweet saying it was not Yogi, (Please follow this link for her comment https://twitter.com/rajalakshmij/status/843192449216401409 and this link for her rebuttal https://twitter.com/sagarikaghose/status/843146510963372033 )but his supporter said so, in Yogi's presence.

Rajdeep Sardesai repeatedly found guilty of forgery par excellence, lie, manipulative journalism tactics, reporting with ulterior motives and character assassination of people belonging to particular ideologies. 

Hence, Mr Rajdeep Sardesai and India Today group are liable for prosecution under 30 various IPC Clauses and Cyber Crime clauses under Information Technology Act-2000, related to forgery, cheating, spreading rumors, creating and flaring up communal tensions and religious riots, and spreading lies through digital and electronic media.

With this email, I am demanding immediate sacking of Mr Rajdeep Sardesai from India Today Group, otherwise I would be compelled to make whole editorial board of your group along with you, to make co-party in a litigation against Mr Rajdeep Sardesai. I hope You, as a Chief Corporate Affairs Officer of the Group and Chief Law & Compliance Officer of TV Today Network Ltd, will take my email seriously and will immediately sack Mr Rajdeep Sardesai from your channel.

If India Today Group doesn't comply with my demand within 7 days of issuance of this notice, I will approach appropriate legal authority to start necessary action against Mr Rajdeep Sardesai and India Today Group, which may spoil millions of rupees from Group's exchequer in fighting it out. 

 Attaching here, the video of Rajdeep Sardesai attributing Yogi Adityanath to rape dead Muslim women.

​Regards,

**********

Convener

LRO

Legal Rights Observatory​

मुग्धा कर्णिक आणि दिव्य मराठी संपादकाविरोधात दापोली पोलिसात FIR दाखल

मुग्धा कर्णिक आणि दिव्य मराठी संपादकाविरोधात दापोली पोलिसात FIR दाखल.

मुर्डी- आंजर्ले (ता. दापोली) येथील RTI कार्यकर्ते श्री. आदित्य पेंडसे यांनी आज दापोली पोलिसात मुंबई विद्यापीठातील प्राध्यापक मुग्धा कर्णिक आणि मराठी दैनिक दिव्य मराठीचे संपादक यांच्याविरोधात संघ आणि संबंधित संघटनांविरोधात गलिच्छ आणि बदनामीकारक आरोप लावल्याबद्दल तक्रार दाखल केली. भारतीय दंड संहितेच्या कलम ५०५(१) B, ५०५(१) C,५०५ (३) आणि IT Act- 2000 ज्याला सायबर क्राईम कायदा म्हणतात, यांच्या अंतर्गत दापोली पोलिसांनी दोघांविरोधात गुन्हे दाखल केले.
दापोली पोलीस सदर प्रकरणाचा तपास वेगाने करत असून दोन्ही संबंधिताना या प्रकरणात कोणत्याही क्षणी अटक होऊ शकते.

Assam's Disastrous Sterilization Drive, Gross Imbalance in Hindus & Muslims Sterilization Exposed by RTI Activist

Young RTI Activist from Assam, Amarjyoti Borthakur and Saumitra Goswamy has exposed gross anomaly and criminal imbalance in male and female sterilization of people of Assam on religious lines. The state which is reeling under intense pressure of illegal Bangladeshi influx, has only aggressively implemented family planning/ sterilization drive in Hindus. The Muslim majority districts of lower Assam or say Brahmaputra valley has alarmingly showing same percent of sterilization in Hindus and Muslims, even when Muslim population is much more than Hindus.

 With such a highly disturbing data in hand, Amarjyoti is seriously exploring various ways to balance the gross imbalance between. He smells the conspiracy behind this imbalance to push already dwindling Hindu population of Assam. While talking in Guwahati, fuming Amarjyoti asked few awkward questions to Government of Assam regarding its seriousness to changing scenario in religious demographics of Assam. He asked, whether this imbalance in sterilization drive was meticulously planned or just administrative snag?
Whatever he has derived through RTI, is really serious in nature and even after BJP came to power last year, the scenario might not have changed much as the government machinery which is enforcing such drives on ground is as it is.
Something must be seriously done in this regard.

मुग्धा कर्णिक यांच्याविरोधात मुंबई विद्यापीठाच्या कुलगुरूंकडे तक्रार दाखल

To,

Shri Sanjay Deshmukh,

Vice Chancellor,

University of Mumbai,

Subject:- Complaint About Mrs.Mugdha Karnik, Director of the Center of Extra-Mural Studies under Mumbai University

Dear Sir,

On March 12, 2017 Mumbai University's Director of the Center of Extra-Mural Studies Mrs.Mugdha Karnik, has published article in Marathi daily Divya Marathi, about RSS and its affiliate groups and their so called involvement in the child trafficking from North East Indian states to elsewhere in India. The article was highly objectionable, biased, packed with lies, intentionally aimed at character assassination of RSS organization and people associated with it.

As Mrs Mugdha Karnik is official of Mumbai university, the article has created the perception among its readers that the opinion expressed in the article belongs to Mumbai University, which is harmful for your institution.

After the publication of that article, i have initiated legal action against said newspaper and Mrs Mugdha Karnik under various IPC sections and provisions of Information Technology Act.

With this letter, I am requesting you, As Administrative and Executive Head of Mumbai University to start disciplinary action against Mrs Mugdha Karnik for violation of standard norms of University employee by setting up inquiry committee on behavior of Mugdha Karnik.

If my request is not honored, I will take various legal corrective measures against Mumbai University and will approach Human Resources Development Ministry to punish guilty official attached to Mumbai University.

If the necessity is felt, my lawyer will include your name as witness in future Criminal Defamation Court Suit against Mrs Karnik.

Regards,

J. M. Sangma,

Rongchu- Garo Hills

Meghalaya

मुग्धा कर्णिक आणि दै. दिव्य मराठीवर कायदेशीर कारवाई सुरु

कायदेशीर नोटीस 

१) मुग्धा कर्णिक- मुंबई,
२) संपादक- दै.दिव्य मराठी

विषय:- दि. १२ मार्च २०१७ च्या अंकातील लेखाबाबत कायदेशीर नोटीस देण्याबाबत..

महोदय/ महोदया,
दि. १२ मार्च २०१७ च्या दै. दिव्य मराठीच्या लेखात, गेल्या वर्षी इंग्रजी साप्ताहिक आउटलुक मध्ये नेहा दीक्षित यांनी केलेल्या संघ आणि समितीवरील खोट्या आणि द्वेषमुलक आरोपांचा पुनरुच्चार करण्यात आलेला आहे. सदर आरोप करताना लेखिका मुग्धा कर्णिक अथवा संपादक यांनी कोणत्याही संघटनेच्या पदाधिकाऱ्याजवळ संपर्क साधून आरोपांची सत्यता पडताळण्याची तसदी घेतलेली दिसत नाही.
सदर लेखात करण्यात आलेले आरोप अत्यंत खोटे, खोडसाळ, अफवा पसरवणारे आणि पूर्वग्रह दुषित असे आहेत.
सदर लेखात करण्यात आलेल्या आरोपांबद्दल नोटीस मिळाल्यापासून १५ दिवसांच्या आत सदर लेखाबद्दल बिनशर्त माफी नं मागितल्यास अथवा समाधानकारक पुरावे मला न दिल्यास मी, लेखिका म्हणून मुग्धा कर्णिक आणि दैनिकाचे संपादक यांच्याविरुद्ध रोन्ग्चू पोलीस ठाणे, गारो हिल्स- मेघालय  येथे भारतीय दंड संहितेच्या कलम 505 (1)b, 505(1)c, 505(3), 599, Information Technology Act-2000 आणि अन्य कठोर कायद्याच्या तरतुदी अंतर्गत आपल्या विरोधात तक्रार दाखल करून कठोर कारवाईची प्रक्रिया सुरु करेन. आणि याशिवाय गरज भासल्यास माझ्या वकीलामार्फत मा. गुवाहाटी उच्च न्यायालयात आपणाविरोधात रीतसर खटला दाखल करेन.
अशा प्रकारच्या खटल्यामुळे आपल्या वैयक्तिक आर्थिक अथवा सामाजिक नुकसानीस मी जबाबदार राहणार नाही याची कृपया नोंद घेण्यात यावी.

कळावे,
जे. एम. संगमा
रोन्ग्चू- गारो हिल्स,
मेघालय