Monday, December 28, 2009

Aziz Burney's article fit for Contempt of Court petition says Legal Experts Panel

Mr.Aziz Burney's article published in Rojnama Rashtriya Sahara (In both Hindi and Urdu) this week is fit for contempt of Court petition,says Legal Expert's panel.In that article Mr.Burney had commented unnecessarily on the Lawsuit filed against him in Navi Mumbai court for Anti-National and Pro-Pakistani articles August this year.
Applicant had approached his legal expert from Mumbai high Court after reading that article,in which he has wrote that even after receiving complaints from the person who has filed the suit against him,central government didn't paid much attention to it;hence indirectly suggesting the court to follow the Central Government's line and not to give much importance to the petition filed against him in Mumbai Session's Court.This is crass and brazen attempt by Mr Aziz Burney to pressurize Judiciary in his favor and to compel the Court to act in his favor.
Second thing is that he has unnecessarily commented in detail on matter which is pending in Court and the article which is meant for generating public opinion against the court procedure to prosecute him for his Anti-National and Pro-Pakistani articles.This is the gross indulgence in Court Procedure and aimed at pressurizing Judiciary for Anti-National purpose.
The Lawyer for applicant has confirmed that Contempt of Court Petition would be filed within shortest possible time so as to resist Mr Burney from writing or commenting publicly on the matter pending in Court and to avoid further attempt to sabotage the legal procedure for his personal gain.
Thus Mr Aziz Burney might face stringent action from Court for encroaching his jurisdiction as a journalist and this may create more troubles for Mr Burney who is already facing charges of sedition and Anti-National activities in Navi Mumbai Court.

Love Jihad in Britain...

Police protect girls forced to convert to Islam
Sir Ian Blair: Police and universities working together to tackle 'aggresive conversions'

Extremist Muslims who force vulnerable teenage girls to convert to Islam are being targeted by police, Met chief Sir Ian Blair has revealed.
Police are working with universities to clamp down on "aggressive conversions" during which girls are beaten up and forced to abandon university courses.
• Muslim pupils 'need their own showers'
The Hindu Forum of Britain claims hundreds of mostly Sikh and Hindu girls have been intimidated by Muslim men who take them out on dates before terrorising them until they convert.
Sir Ian spoke about the problem at a conference organised by the forum.
A Met spokesman said: "Neighbourhood officers work with university authorities in London and we would encourage anyone targeted in this way to seek help and support and where necessary use third party reporting facilities if they do not want to contact police directly."
Ramesh Kallidai, of the Hindu Forum of Britain, said: "Some girls are petrified because they are constantly being phoned up, having their door knocked.
"One girl was beaten up on the street and others have been forced to leave university."
• Met police chiefs are to review a controversial stop-and-search power used in the fight against terrorism. Assistant commissioner Andy Hayman, the overall head of Britain's anti-terrorist operations, said he had concerns about the number of stops carried out in London using Section 44 legislation.

click here for original news...

Friday, December 25, 2009

Juval Aviv's adice

Advice from an Israeli Agent
Juval Aviv was the Israeli Agent upon whom the movie 'Munich' was based. He was Golda Meir's bodyguard, and she appointed him to track down and bring to justice the Palestinian terrorists who took the Israeli athletes hostage and killed them during the Munich Olympic Games.


In a lecture in New York City he shared information that EVERY American needs to know -- but that our government has not yet shared with us.

He predicted the London subway bombing on the Bill O'Reilly show on Fox News stating publicly that it would happen within a week. At the time, O'Reilly laughed, and mocked him saying that in a week he wanted him back on the show. Unfortunately, within a week the terrorist attack had occurred.

Juval Aviv gave intelligence (via what he had gathered in Israel and the Middle East) to the Bush Administration about 9/11, a month before it occurred. His report specifically said they would use planes as bombs and target high profile buildings and monuments. Congress has since hired him as a security consultant.

Now for his future predictions. He predicts the next terrorist attack on the U.S. will occur within the next few months.

Forget hijacking airplanes, because he says terrorists will NEVER try and hijack a plane again as they know the people onboard will never go down quietly again. Aviv believes our airport security is a joke -- that we have been reactionary rather than proactive in developing strategies that are truly effective.

For example:

1) Our airport technology is outdated. We look for metal, and the new explosives are made of plastic.

2) He talked about how some idiot tried to light his shoe on fire. Because of that, now everyone has to take off their shoes. A group of idiots tried to bring aboard liquid explosives. Now we can't bring liquids on board. He says he's waiting for some suicidal maniac to pour liquid explosive on his underwear; at which point, security will have us all traveling naked!
Every strategy we have is reactionary.

3) We only focus on security when people are heading to the gates.

Aviv says that if a terrorist attack targets airports in the future, they will target busy times on the front end of the airport when/where people are checking in. It would be easy for someone to take two suitcases of explosives, walk up to a busy check-in line, ask a person next to them to watch their bags for a minute while they run to the restroom or get a drink, and then detonate the bags BEFORE security even gets involved. In Israel, security checks bags BEFORE people can even ENTER the airport.

Aviv says the next terrorist attack here in America is imminent and will involve suicide bombers and non-suicide bombers in places where large groups of people congregate. (i.e., Disneyland, Las Vegas casinos, big cities (New York, San Francisco, Chicago, etc.) and that it will also include shopping malls, subways in rush hour, train stations, etc., as well as, rural America this time. The interlands (Wyoming, Montana, etc.).

The attack will be characterized by simultaneous detonations around the country (terrorists like big impact), involving at least 5-8 cities, including rural areas.

Aviv says terrorists won't need to use suicide bombers in many of the larger cities, because at places like the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, they can simply valet park a car loaded with explosives and walk away.

Aviv says all of the above is well known in intelligence circles, but that our U. S. Government does not want to 'alarm American citizens' with the facts. The world is quickly going to become 'a different place', and issues like 'global warming' and political correctness will become totally irrelevant.

On an encouraging note, he says that Americans don't have to be concerned about being nuked. Aviv says the terrorists who want to destroy America will not use sophisticated weapons. They like to use suicide as a front-line approach. It's cheap, it's easy, it's effective; and they have an infinite abundance of young militants more than willing to 'meet their destiny'.

He also says the next level of terrorists, over which America should be most concerned, will not be coming from abroad. But will be, instead, 'homegrown', having attended and been educated in our own schools and universities right here in the U.S. He says to look for 'students' who frequently travel back and forth to the Middle East. These young terrorists will be most dangerous because they will know our language and will fully understand the habits of Americans; but that we Americans won't know/understand a thing about them.

Aviv says that, as a people, Americans are unaware and uneducated about the terrorist threats we will inevitably face. America still has only a handful of Arabic and Farsi speaking people in our intelligence networks, and Aviv says it is critical that we change that fact SOON.

So, what can America do to protect itself? From an intelligence perspective, Aviv says the U.S. needs to stop relying on satellites and technology for intelligence. We need to, instead, follow Israel's, Ireland's and England's hands-on examples of human intelligence, both from an infiltration perspective as well as to pay attention to, and trust 'aware' citizens to help. We need to engage and educate ourselves as citizens; however, our U. S. government continues to treat us, its citizens, 'like babies'. Our government thinks we 'can't handle the truth' and are concerned that we'll panic if we understand the realities of terrorism. Aviv says this is a deadly mistake.

Aviv recently created/executed a security test for our Congress, by placing an empty briefcase in five well-traveled spots in five major cities. The results? Not one person called 911 or sought a policeman to check it out. In fact, in Chicago, someone tried to steal the briefcase!

In comparison, Aviv says that citizens of Israel are so well 'trained' that an unattended bag or package would be reported in seconds by citizen(s) who know to publicly shout, 'Unattended Bag!' The area would be quickly & calmly cleared by the citizens themselves.

Unfortunately, America hasn't been yet 'hurt enough' by terrorism for their government to fully understand the need to educate its citizens or for the government to understand that it's their citizens who are, inevitably, the best first-line of defense against terrorism.

Aviv also was concerned about the high number of children here in America who were in preschool and kindergarten after 9/11, who were 'lost' without parents being able to pick them up, and about our schools that had no plan in place to best care for the students until parents could get there. (In New York City, this was days, in some cases!)

He stresses the importance of having a plan, that's agreed upon within your family, of how to respond in the event of a terrorist emergency. He urges parents to contact their children's schools and demand that the schools too, develop plans of actions, just as they do in Israel.

Does your family know what to do if you can't contact one another by phone? Where would you gather in an emergency? He says we should all have a plan that is easy enough for even our youngest children to remember and follow.

Aviv says that the U. S. government has in force a plan, that in the event of another terrorist attack, EVERYONE's ability to use cell phones, blackberries, etc., will immediately be cut-off, as this is the preferred communication source used by terrorists and is often the way that their bombs are detonated.

How will you communicate with your loved ones in the event you cannot speak to each other? You need to have a plan.

If you understand, and believe what you have just read, then you must feel compelled to send this to every concerned parent, guardian, grandparents, uncles, aunts, whomever. Don't stop there. In addition to sharing this via e-mail, contact and discuss this information with whomever it makes sense to. Make contingency plans with those you care about. Better that you have plans in place, and never have to use them, then to have no plans in place, and find you needed them.

If you choose not to share this, or not to have a plan in place, and nothing ever occurs -- good for you! However, in the event something does happen, and even moreso, if it directly affects your loved ones, then this e-mail will haunt you forever.

Telling yourself after the fact, "I should have sent this to so and so, but deleted it as so much trash from old Bill Jones, plus, I just didn't believe it", will not change anything. You were alerted, had the chance to do something, and instead of erring on the side of caution, you chose to disregard, if nothing else, a sensible, valuable warning.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Contempt of Court petition against Aziz Burney...

Contempt of Court petition against Aziz Burney...

Mr.Aziz Burney-Group Editor of Sahara Publications is in great trouble now a days. Earlier in August this year Aziz Burney has been dragged in Mumbai session's Court for publishing anti-India articles in his papers.That case is being investigated by Police and they are expected to file their report to Court after which Court will issue Warrant against him;most probably non-bailable warrant.
But today Mr Burney seems to be in more serious trouble than earlier by commenting on Sub-Judicial matter in his paper and republishing the Anti-National and Pro-Pakistani claims which he made in previous issues.
After reading today's article thrashing court procedure against him( Click here for article) the applicant in earlier case has started discussing the team of Lawyers to file Contempt of Court Petition against Mr Burney for using his paper to pressurize judiciary and to reproduce Pro-Pakistani claims in more objectionable manner,Also Burney referred to militant Ajmal Kasab's statement(in which Kasab denied charges slapped upon him in Mumbai attack case) to bolster his theory of Mumbai Police's involvement in Mumbai Terror Attack.
The team of Mumbai High Court Lawyers are expected to take legal opinion from various sections of Legal fraternity and then to decide the date for filing Contempt of Court Petition against Mr Aziz Burney and MD Sahara Publication.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Deity Aane Donyi Nyishi, Tagin, Bangni tribes of The Arunachal Pradesh

Deity Aane Donyi Nyishi, Tagin, Bangni tribes of The Arunachal Pradesh

God Nani Intaya of MISHMIS tribe of The Arunachal Pradesh

God Nani Intaya of MISHMIS tribe of The Arunachal Pradesh




People of sober nature still maintain deep-rooted aesthetic values in their day-to-day life with great pride and honour. All pervading goddess Nani-Intaya is the sole creator of the universe for the Idus.
The Idus have their distinct dialect, which falls under the Tibeto-Burman group of languages. Traditionally, Idus believe in animism. They worship several benevolent and malevolent spirits. Nani-Intaya and Masello Zino are worshipped as creators of mankind and universe as a whole.

Great Deity Rangfrah of Tangsa,tuksa, wagcho tribes of The Arunachal Pradesh

Great Deity Rangfrah of Tangsa,tuksa, wagcho tribes of The Arunachal Pradesh



Rangfarah is the deity worshiped by the major population of Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh, India, an indigenous god believed to be an incarnation of Shiva.
The major communities worshiping the Rangfarah are Muklom, Lunchangs, Juglis, Tutsas and Kimsings. Most of these villages have a temple known as Rangnuwk hum meaning God's worship place. Every year on December 31 people go on processions to stop the conversion which is increasing exponentially in the state.This procession is carried out by a community called the Indigenous Faith community of Arunachal Pradesh. Hundreds of people participate.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Swiss ban on Mosque Minarets and Indian Muslim Structures

murdikar:
There is great uproar across the whole world after Swiss citizens voted in referendum in favor of banning Mosque Minarets in Switzerland.There are only four Mosques in Switzerland which has tall minarets,but Swiss people takes it as the symbol of the Religious supremacy and hence do not want allow it anymore to build in future.The image and reputation of Islam is going through serious crisis after worldwide resurgence of radical Extremist Wahabi Islam and Suicide bombers under the guise of JIHAD i.e.Holy Islamic war against non-Muslims.



The string of bans and embargoes on ostentatious religious symbols has been started from France when French President Sarkozy first announced ban on Burqa or veil-garment of Muslim woman covering face in public places,and them comes Swiss vote against minarets.
In India there are almost 180 million Muslims,second largest Muslim population in the world,where Muslims was in power for about 800 long years.There is also growing resentment in India against divisive Muslim mentality.But Indian Muslims enjoys more freedom and liberties even more than they deserves.
Now the circumstances demands that there should be certain bans on public life of Indian Muslims so as to make them aware that at first they are citizens of India and then they are Muslims..

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Nonie Darwish and Swiss Minaret's issue


Former Muslims United Applauds Swiss Referendum Victory Banning Minarets, “the Bayonets of Islam”

Nonie Darwish, executive director and co-founder of Former Muslims United (FMU) applauded the results of a Swiss Republic referendum banning the construction of minarets among the approximately 150 Mosques serving 400,000 Muslims in Switzerland. Minarets are Muslim towers to call the faithful to prayers through loud speakers five times daily. These towers are symbols to both Muslims and non-Muslims of the Islamization of Europe, America and other Western democracies.

Ms. Darwish of FMU said: "the Swiss referendum victory is the equivalent of banning what Turkish PM Erdogan called: ‘the bayonets of Islam.’ Supporters of a ban claim that allowing minarets would represent the growth of an ideology and a legal system - Sharia law - which are incompatible with Swiss democracy. The Swiss Referendum victory drew a red line against Islamization in Europe.”

She also noted that “this referendum victory is a credit to Swiss citizens, especially women voters who viewed construction of Minarets as leading to adoption of other graphic elements of Sharia law including wearing of burkas in public by Muslim women.” Darwish also pointed out that polls taken after the victory in the Swiss Referendum in neighboring Germany indicated that a similar effort there might win a plurality of votes.

Darwish added that "many Muslim groups are denouncing the ban as oppression to freedom of religion. However, such Muslim groups will be more credible if they first denounced the oppression of religious minorities in Muslim countries who make it illegal to practice any religion other than Islam. Muslim groups who claim that they are oppressed in Europe should be the first to stand up and yell "not in the name of my religion" when Churches are burnt in Muslim countries. But instead all we hear from Muslim groups is "I am a victim" and "I am offended" while the blood of non-Muslims is being shed in the name of Sharia.

Former Muslims United is a US-based civil rights organization with the goals of seeking the protecting the human and civil rights of Apostates from Islam in accordance with the laws of the United States and its Constitution.


Co-founders of Former Muslims United
Nonie Darwish, Ibn Warraq, Amil Imani, Wafa Sultan,
Mohammed Asghar, Mano Bakh, Walid Shoebat

Add to Google