The Congress is not the only one still struggling to come to terms with the election loss. Some media houses and their editors are in a quandary. This is because unlike the past 25 years this is the first time there is a single party with a full majority. For “self-styled morality anchors” like Barkha Dutt and Arnab Goswami this is a problem because they are unable to manipulate a party or its alliance partners to concoct news. And since that “communal” party has come to power they have been consistently concocting some fake story or the other to claim extremists are raising their ugly heads. Of course, by “extremists” they obviously mean Hindus in some way or the other. But the blatant and extreme abuse of Hindus and Hinduism that happened on Timesnow on July 25through Arnab Goswami has established a new threshold for barbaric behaviour by a TV anchor. This scumbag who shouts all the time and accuses others of shouting has embarked on a new mission of inciting communal hatred through his channel.
On July 25 in his debate Arnab raged against the Hindus for 4 issues: One Goa MLADeepak Dhavalikar said with Modi as PM India could be a “Hindu Nation”, two the Goa Deputy CM Francis D’Souza defended Dhavalikar’s right to his opinion and said it is Hindustan and all are Hindus and that he was a Christian Hindu. Third, was Dinanath Batra who has written some texts seeking “Akhand Bharat” and fourth and most important a dispute relating to loudspeakers at a Hindu temple in Moradabad which is a predominantly Muslim area. The anti-Hindu venom-menu was complete. What Arnab unleashed was phenomenal hatred and attempts to somehow imply that it’s Modi and BJP was the culprit behind all these events. Let’s watch the first debate (9.28 mins – Note: The videos in this post are edited to keep only the relevant portions. Full videos of the debate are on Timesnow site and also Youtube):
So much ruckus over the “Hindu nation” comment. First, the MLA, Dhavalikar, made that statement in the Goa Assembly and he is well within his rights to speak his mind. The law allows him that benefit as much as it allowed Asad Owaisi to make his “3rd wav radicalisation” threat in the parliament. MLAs and MPs have complete freedom of speech as long as they are speaking within the legislatures. So Arnab is wrong to make a big issue out of it. Secondly, Francis D’Souza didn’t make the “Hindu nation” comment on his own. He was asked by a reporter on Dhavalikar’s comment to which he responded saying “everyone has his opinion, you have yours, I have mine and Dhavalikar has his” and there is no need to make a controversy out of everything. When pestered, D’Souza said that we call it “Hindustan” and in that sense everyone is a Hindu and that he is a Christian Hindu. This was blown up deliberately to create a controversy.
To all this, Arnab rages asking if India is a “Hindu nation” in the religious sense of the term when D’Souza was stating that only in the sense of what is being referred to as Hindustan and not as a religion. He himself is a Christian and that is pretty obvious to any moron so why would he refer to that in religious terms. But then like theMaharashtra Sadan waiter or Sania Mirza Arnab wants some Hindu-bashing or BJP-bashing for fun. When told that Hinduism is a way of life and there is nothing wrong with that he disputes the 1995 SC observation in a case relating to Bal Thackeray. Where Arnab’s moronery reaches a peak is that he says the SC said “Hinduism is a way of life” in upholding an HC judgement over Bal Thackeray using religion for politics. Whether a judgement is favourable or unfavourable to a party, the SC’s observation still remains valid. Since when do morons like Arnab start deciding that the SC observation on a specific issue is valid only when a judgement goes one way? The SC’s observation on Hinduism stands no matter the silly interpretation of Arnab or media crooks like him. The SC’s observation does not become invalid because it criticises BalT as Arnab points out. This is how stupid the man is.
As the BJP spokie Sudhanshu Trivedi points out, it will be hard to define Hinduism in a manner that one can clearly define Christianity or Islam. And what has Ashok Singhal’s demands or statements got to do with this? So, when your arguments are stupid you bring in other elements to show Hindus or BJP in a poor light. What exactly is wrong with Singhal making his statements or demands? He can make as many demands as he wants as long as he is not threatening or invoking violence to seek his demands. If he seeks Muslims to respect Hindu sentiments and surrender Ayodhya what crime does he commit? Does he threaten to attack them if they didn’t? He may even seek India to conquer Pakistan and annexe it. Which law prohibits him from saying that? Such stupid issues are tagged on to BJP for mere political agenda of Arnab. Behind all this what is Arnab really hiding? The fact that the most communal and religion-based agenda crooks are Congress and its clones.
At 4.32 in the video Trivedi rightly asks that if religion has no place in secular nature of our govt why should MMS say “Muslims have the first right over resources?” Next he points out that the same Congress declared in Mizoram that if they won they will rule by Catholic principles. What is all that crap? That’s not fantasy that is the truth. BJP didn’t say if they came to power they will rule according to Hindutva.
Arnab then pounces on Dinanath Batra who wants “Akhand Bharat”. Now he too may want an “Akhand Bharat” from Afghanistan to Cambodia or whatever. But does anyone really want that? I certainly do not want Pakistan or Afghanistan or Bangladesh back as part of India. It would be the biggest nuisance to this country. So one man’s whimsical dreams are an issue? Arnab’s argument is that the Gujarat Board endorses that book. There are many book that State Boards endorse half of which belong in the dustbin. Instead of cherry picking on one single book, the media morons would do well to look up all the books that state boards endorse, especially Commie states, and you would realise most of them are terrible and some even anti-national. In addition, the same media morons would do well to pick on the fake history books that our Commies have written and filled with lies.
Arnab rants as if the Akhand Bharat is a mountain that is going to fall on people’s heads. There are text books that have biographies of Pappus like Rahul Gandhi and passages about Barkha Dutt. Are we to believe our kids should be taught about these rogues? It is clearly a matter of sheer opinion of those who run the boards and only a good national policy on this can eliminate such stupidity. This is a bogus topic to be clubbed with any BJP agenda of the Centre. This is just to pick on something to use as a stick to beat up Modi. For every case of some Hindu’s whimsical statements or writings there are hundreds of Mullahs issuing Fatwas which are unconstitutional. Ever see Hindu-hating media pull them up? No, they pee in their pants and skirts fearing for their life. Recently, another Mullah wanted to send a militia of 5Lakh Muslim Sunnis. Can Arnab dare to pull him up? No! Because, if Arnab dared, his neck would be under threat and so would be his studio. But Hindus don’t pose that threat so hate them and bash them as frequently as you can and tag them as “Communal” because the BJP is largely supported by Hindus. That’s coward Arnab for you.
When Rahul Easwar brings up Shah Bano case, Arnab asks why that should come in here. Well, why should Ashok Singhal come in here? Only those diversions that suit your agenda are acceptable? The Shah Bano case is the most shameful chapter of this country nullifying an SC judgement to please the Muslims. That is an act of religion-based law making and not based on the prevailing Constitution. But yeah, that is a “separate” issue which shouldn’t be brought up because it hurts the cause of Arnab’s mindless Hindu-bashing exercise.
At around 7.55 in the video Trivedi correctly summarises the “sickular” media mafia’s approach to Hindus and BJP as a party. Riots in Gujarat, blame BJP! Riots in Kishtwar,blame BJP! Riots in UP, blame BJP! Riots in Bihar, blame BJP! Riots in Hyderabad,blame BJP! Riots in Jupiter, blame BJP! Oops! Reminds me of the Mafia bosses; they want their cut no matter how your business is doing. No matter what the riots and who ignites them, blame the BJP and the Hindus. Like I said in my previous post our media doesn’t give a damn if Hindus die. They rejoice it and so does Arnab. During the course of the show it was pretty clear that Arnab was wrong and on the backfoot. I am discounting all the bogus rants of that Commie bimbo called Atul Anjan because Commies never make any sense. They still harp on RSS killed MKGandhi and such nonsense. The mischief Arnab played will be evident from the fact that in the video that Timesnow uploaded on their site of this particular debate, the following portion was deleted:
All these bogus questions and the outrageous demand by Arnab for a “guarantee” from Trivedi to prevent violence at Moradabad was deleted. Why? Why should a guy from BJP guarantee there will be no violence in Moradabad when they are neither in govt nor the main Opposition in that state? Tomorrow this moron Arnab will demand BJP to guarantee there will be no violence in Tamil Nadu or Kerala? Such is the sickness of Arnab that he wants to accuse the Hindus of fomenting violence when the opposite has always been the case. In any “group” clashes as our stupid media calls them, one party is always a known entity.
Truth, as pointed out by Trivedi, is that the courts did not hold Modi responsible for Gujarat 2002 and the SC held UP govt responsible for Muzaffarnagar. But Hindus are the criminals who kill others, is it? The people of the “peaceful” religion were on another trip elsewhere inSaharanpur. The political parties and media first started point fingers at BJP but found their lies can’t travel far so started blaming the SP. That’s how criminals like Arnab work in the media. There is another trick that Arnab employed to concoct this entire anti-Hindu fake debate. He thoughtShahid Siddiqui will be handy for some Hindu-bashing but it turns out Shahid had views that weren’t sympathetic to the Muslim stand so he dropped him with a lie saying debate was cancelled when it was not. It is okay for TV channels to pick and choose panellists with opposing views to create an artificial balance in the debate but to tell a person with views opposed to Arnab’s that the topic was “cancelled” is blatant mischief which exposes the motive of anti-Hindu hate-mongering. Let’s watch the second video of this extended debate (4.49 mins):
Okay! So Arnab starts out saying it will be difficult for the BJP to do this “surreptitiously’. What is surreptitious about what is going in Moradabad? In this day and age when stray acts of stupidity are captured on mobiles is this guy still thinking that open acts in the public domain are undertaken covertly? There is nothing covert about all this. But the worse was yet to come. Arnab rants that the loudspeaker at a temple is a “new phenomenon” and there is no tradition of Hindu temples having loudspeakers. That’s a LIE! And which world does this hate-monger live in? At Tirupati the morning “Suprabhatam” plays on loudspeakers in the entire temple town complex. Many important holy shrines in the south, north and west have loudspeakers. I wonder if Arnab has ever been to any of the major Hindu temples. And then he wants to expose the “ignorance” of Sambit Patra, the BJP spokie, when in reality it is Arnab who is the bimbo here. Ignorance!
Mind you, there is no riot in Moradabad and Sambit Patra asks the right question “by repeated discussion on this are you forcing a riot on this country?” That nailed it! That is exactly what our media morons have been striving for all these last 2 months. When cornered, Arnab quickly shifts the topic to “people are dying on the streets, they want food”. So then discuss that instead of loudspeakers. Others are diverting the topic he accuses but what is Arnab doing when cornered? Why then do you discuss snoopgate or Gaza or any topic? Discuss food and people on the streets all the time. Such is the tomfoolery of our anchors. They want to see a spate of communal riots and then claim “we told you so about Modi”. These headlines will than travel across the world to paint the Modi-govt as communal riot-mongers even BJP has nothing to do with it. Trust me; it is indeed happening as this clip shows:
Clearly, the ones instigating the riots in Saharanpur appear to be Congis and the targets of the Muslim rioters were Sikhs. BJP had nothing to do with it but that’s the objective of Arnab and hate-mongers like him. They will quietly whisper to themselves “Mission Accomplished”. That’s the agenda. It doesn’t end there. Arnab goes on to make one of the most audacious and hate-filled statement yet. He says “You create a temple, you create a conflict, and you put up a loudspeaker”. What was that crap all about? BJP is in the business of creating or putting up temples in Muslim areas? And what the hell does Arnab mean by implying you can’t have temples in Muslim areas where Hindus are a minority? Is it unlawful or unconstitutional and Hindus should vacate Muslim-majority areas or should be killed or thrown out like KPs? This is what the mindless nonsense of Arnab implies and in his rage and agenda of bashing BJP he forgets what nonsense he talks. It doesn’t occur to hate-mongers like Arnab that Islamists are building an “Islamic University” at Tirupati which is one of the holiest sites for Hindus. Will Muslims tolerate such an act? And Arnab wants to destroy a temple just because it is in a Muslim dominated area? That’s as good as saying Hindus should not live in or practice their religion in Muslim-majority areas. Who the hell is this guy to make these laws?
By Arnab’s stupid logic Muslims should not live in a Hindu-majority country at all. More power to separatists, ISIS, IM… Kill Hindus living in Muslim areas. Arnab supports it. As Sambit rightly points out Arnab wants to inflame communal passions and if he can provoke a riot that would be a bonus for whoever his masters are and their money. This is the media agenda when they make the Maharashtra Sadan a “communal” issue or get Sania Mirza to go on a “tear-jerking” trip on TV channels. Yeah, the iRudaliBarkha Dutt is always there to exploit Muslims to incite more hatred against Hindus and BJP. Now Arnab has become Sagarika Ghose who did the same earlier on CNN-IBN. Yesterday was Eid. As usual, Muslims occupied public places for their morning prayers. Mosques are not enough, private society grounds are not enough for them. Where do they go? Here, take a look:
That is Bandra station in Mumbai. The ANI tweet conveniently blacks out the exact location. MSM for you! Not only have the Muslims blocked out the entire station front yard, they have extended themselves to the main road just outside the station. This is “Sickularism” for Arnab and similar hate-mongers. How do govts allow permission to people for such blockade of railway stations? And in previous years Muslims have occupied even highways and expressways in mass gatherings. And the MSM morons have a problem with Hindus and a loudspeaker in Moradabad. Day after day, week after week the MSM and certain political parties encourage the minorities to do the most outrageous things and then protect them as victims. They ask Hindus to be tolerant. And when some stray guy makes some comment, hatemongers like Arnab turn it into a great calamity that has fallen on the nation which threatens the very survival of India. That’s the game. By the way, as they rant about Hindu atrocities with “words” that torture and threaten the nation; on the ground physically the reverse is happening as Arnab’s own reporter (Aditya Kaul) ironically slams his stupidity and irony:
The perverted MSM crooks like Arnab will tolerate destruction of Hindu temples. They will tolerate Mullahs issuing fatwas. They will tolerate a Mullah wanting to raise a militia (who will eventually be at your door as bill collectors or blood collectors). None of that is a threat to them. But a loudspeaker at a temple in Moradabad is a problem and for that Arnab is willing to unleash extraordinary hate against Hindus and their practices. He claims he too is a proud Hindu. No moron, you’re not a Hindu, you’re a media crook. And you do no favour to Hindus or anyone by claiming to be a Hindu.
Forget what the SC said about Hinduism. The most important observation to come from the SC in recent years is the way it lambasted the media for exposing innocents to death by their stupid coverage of the 26/11 attacks (read the full SC report). There are criminals in the media who relish a tragedy, including communal riots. Many of them have made a fortune scavenging on the Gujarat riots. It is time the Modi govt framed adequate laws to make the media liable if they provoke communal hatred through their concocted debates. People like Arnab Goswami don’t have the right to tell Hindus where to live and what to practice. Arnab is inadvertently and foolishly provoking Muslim hatred for Hindus. We can do without such anchors.